Asylum Seekers and our Policy of Positive Asylum — Part Two

Now it should be pretty obvious from what we said in Part One, that appealing to empathy as our guiding principle makes it clear what not to do as far as our immigration policy. But what would empathy mean in terms of a positive policy? The amazing quality of empathy is that possessing it enables one to look not just one side of the story (the one that affects YOU the most) but to be able to look at an issue from all sides. We are concerned with the fairest, most just solution for all rather than just looking after the interests of a few. In this realm, merely materialistic and economic considerations are not the dominant force. There is much more to life than money.

Our Plan for Positive Asylum

On a broader scheme of our views on immigration, I will first compare and contrast what I see as essentially three perspectives that could be taken.

  • Firstly, we receive asylum seekers into our country and allow them to be freely enrolled in our welfare system, at the expense of our citizens.
  • Secondly, reacting to such a concept, we build up a wall, preventing immigration to a great degree.
  • Thirdly, what we dub “Positive Asylum,” which I will explain lastly.

If our Movement were to one day gain power in the shaping our our Nation’s immigration policies, this would be one defining point in our Movement’s programme.

In a welfare-dominated state, it is easy to look to our capacity to financially bear the burden of more needy asylum seekers as our primary concern. Where does the Government get the money to support the welfare system? It taxes its citizens, of course. So then it would only seem right that the interests of its citizens would be an important factor in deciding to increase this monetary burden, right?

welfare1

Immigration at tax-payers expense

Of course, this would seem quite unreasonable, expecting the citizens of our Nation to bear an increasing burden involuntarily through their taxes. Aside from this, there are forces which assume that protecting our economy and culture requires that we oppose further immigration, maybe even considering deporting people “back to where they’re from.”

Anti-immigration policies set to “protect” our Citizens

Anti-immigration policies set to “protect” our Citizens

Well, now consider for a moment a whole shift in our paradigm.

Rather than gauging our Nation’s capacity for immigration on our welfare capacity, instead we look to our labour capacity. In no way do we advocate that asylum seekers would assume the right to welfare. (Neither do we assume this for citizens, for that matter.) Instead, we would support asylum seekers in finding their own employment in the private sector. It is amazing the capacity shown by grateful immigrants to find employment (a lesson could be learned by some supposed “citizens”).

Now for those who are unable to find such employment, we will establish a sufficient schedule of compulsory state-organized labour which would more than offset their living expenses (as well as contributing positively to the continued development and maintenance of our Nation’s infrastructure). This not only makes it fair for taxpayers, but gives the asylum seekers themselves respectability as contributing members of society (and hence, eventually worthy of citizenship). Towards such hard-working immigrants, contributing their strength and energy to our Nation, any negativity would be indefensible. Thus we express our empathy both for the asylum seekers and and at the same time for taxpayers – positive asylum.

positive asylum1

Both the citizen and refugee work to build up our Nation. Aid is given where necessary to both in exchange for creative labour.

Grass-Roots” Initiatives for Immigrants and Citizens

In the mean time, there are many positive ways that both immigrants and citizens can pave the way for greater understanding on both sides and a greater sense of harmony.

First of all, here’s our advice for immigrants:

  • You should voluntarily renounce your former citizenship, even though it’s not legally required to obtain citizenship here in Australia. You should also discard all national flags and other national symbols of your former country.
  • You should make an effort to become fluent in English as quickly as possible. If you speak only English in public, it shows respect to our Nation. Also whenever possible, speak English at home. Decide to make English, not the language of the country from which you emigrated, the first language of your offspring.
  • If you are ever subjected to violence or intimidation, do not relocate. Such tactics are aimed at pressuring you to move from your home; by moving, you indicate to the far-right that their tactics are effective and thus encourage them to use the same tactics on others. Stay put, be trained and equipped to defend yourself and seek support from fair-minded people in your community.

Here’s our advice to Citizens:

  • Do not assume that anyone is an immigrant based on appearance. Criticize others who make such unfounded assumptions. Do not patronize anyone with special treatment, either favourable or unfavourable, on the basis that they are immigrants.
  • Openly counter all attempts to incite hostility against immigrants. Expose their technique of manipulation through fear. Emphasize that whatever one’s opinion may be about handling of immigration issues, it does not entitle one to harass immigrants themselves. Instill the mentality that hostility against immigrants who are part of a local community is hostility against the local community as a whole.

Now most importantly, here is what needs to happen on both sides:

  • Make an effort to socialize across denominational lines. Identify foremost with your locality. Use the pronoun “we”/”us”/”our” to refer to this locality. Be a regular customer of local small businesses. Donate to and volunteer at local charities. Be prepared to physically defend fellow members of your local community against violence by far-right gangs, ideally by forming neighbourhood patrols (which can also do peaceful community work).
  • Remind others that these times of economic hardship are ultimately a test of character, in which the cowardly will increasingly preach division while the heroic will insist on goodwill in spite of all. Those who fail this test will be those who allow the hardship to defeat them, that they choose the coward’s road. Those who triumph will be those who pull together and compensate with spiritual rapport what we lack in material security.

An Empathetically-Governed State

Ultimately this same governing principle would affect our entire social welfare system. We would certainly want to have empathy for those who are suffering, or for whatever reason, lack the capacity for employment. But we don’t want to produce a patronizing system that causes people to become permanent dependents on the State. Instead, we would create a way for them to gain self-esteem as contributing members of society. Our society does not have to have a systemic unemployment problem.

Looking to the ensign of our Movement, we see the words of our National Anthem almost prophetic of our great hope, pointing towards our Movement’s goal:

Beneath our radiant Southern Cross

We’ll toil with hearts and hands;

To make this commonwealth of ours

Renowned of all the lands;

For those who’ve come across the seas

We’ve boundless plains to share;

With courage let us all combine

To Advance Australia Fair.

banner

BACK TO PART ONE

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Anti-Racism, Asylum-Seekers, Economics, Immigration, True Nationalism and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s